VISHAL KUMAR SOMVANSHI S/O LAXMINARAYAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/8849/2025 · 2025-11-13
Sameer Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39304 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39304 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:45609] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8849/2025 Vishal Kumar Somvanshi S/o Laxminarayan, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Khudiyaan, Police Station Bahtukalan, Dholagarh, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Sub J/c Kotputli, Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narendra Mewara For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Anirudh Singh HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 13/11/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 475/2024 registered at Police Station Mathura Gate District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406 BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submit that applicant is a young man aged 24 years. It is further submitted that matter is triable by Magistrate. Furthermore, it is submitted that applicant is in custody ever since 19.03.2025. Furthermore, it is submitted that applicant is ready to abide by the conditions imposed by this Court.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. It is submitted that there are 9
[2025:RJ-JP:45609] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8849/2025] criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant and he is threat to society.
4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that accused-applicant is a young man of 24 years; that applicant is in custody ever-since 19.03.2025; that matter is triable by Magistrate; and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail applications of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Vishal Kumar Somvanshi S/o Laxminarayan shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- before the trial Court concerned, along with bank guarantee of Rs. 15,00,000/- in favour of the complainant, till the pendency of the trial; for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
6. Considering the criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant, this court deems it fit to direct the accused- applicant shall contribute to the Swach Bharat Abhiyan – initiative of the government, for a period of two months, on two hours per day basis, as an honorary work, under the supervision and directions of the SHO qua the FIR (Supra) in consonance with the directions of the Municipal Corporation/Local Administrative authorities concerned.
[2025:RJ-JP:45609] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8849/2025]
7. This Court makes it clear that no opinion is expressed on the merits/demerits of the case and the same shall not be prejudiced before the trial Court.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /17