Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39302 (CHH)

YASHWANT NIRMALKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1797/2022 · 2025-07-17

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:33960 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1797 of 2022 1. Yashwant Nirmalkar S/o Shri Nandkumar Nirmalkar Aged About 26 Years R/o 16/194, Mekend Gali, Firaha Gali, Tatyapara Ward, Shiv Nagar, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Tushar Soni S/o Shri Rajaram Soni Aged About 20 Years R/o Village And Post Bhimbhori, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, P. S. Raipur Kotwali, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. C. M. S Info Systems Limited Through Gaurav Pratap Shahi S/o Shri Virendra Pratap Shahi Aged About 32 Years, Presently Posted As Branch Manager, C. M. S Info Systerms Limited, Branch Raipur, Having Its Office At C/243/b-6, Ward No. 46, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Ward, Vallabh Nagar, Pridarshni Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Pin 492001 ... Non-applicant(s) For Applicants : Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer. For Non-applicant No. 2 : Mr. Karan Kumar Baharani, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 18 .07.2025 1. Heard Mr. Anmol Sharma, learned counsel for the applicants. Also herd Mr. Shailendra Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for non- BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.07.18 18:50:27 +0530 2 applicant No. 1/State and Mr. Karan Kumar Baharani, learned counsel, appearing for non-applicant No. 2. 2. The present petition has been filed by the applicants with the following prayers: “A. Quash the FIR No. 0197 of 2022 under Sections 420, 406 and 34 of the IPC lodged at P.S. Raipur Kotwali, Chhattisgarh on 24.06.2022 and all and any consequential criminal proceedings arising out of the said crime number; And/or B. Pass such other orders/directions as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit proper in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience.” 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this petition further as the charge-sheet has already been submitted before the competent Court. 4. Learned State counsel also endorses the said submission made by the learned counsel for the applicants. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed without any further liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan