SAKSHI D/O VENKTAPPA LAGALI v. VENKAPPA S/O AJJAPPA LAGALI
WP/106661/2018 · 2025-02-12
Ashok S Kinagi
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3930 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3930 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:2763 WP No. 106661 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 106661 OF 2018 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1.
SAKSHI D/O VENKTAPPA LAGALI AGED: 6 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
2.
SOUMYA D/O VENKAPPA LAGALI AGED: 2 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
SINCE MINORS, REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT. DUNDAVVA W/O VENKAPPA LAGALI, AGED: 24 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & HOUSE HOLD WORK, R/O: HONAKUPPI, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI.
3.
SMT. DUNDAVVA W/O VENKAPPA LAGALI AGED: 24 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & HOUSE HOLD WORK, R/O: HONAKUPPI, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G.I. GACHCHINAMATH, ADV)
AND:
VENKAPPA S/O AJJAPPA LAGALI AGED: 28 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HONAKUPPI, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI.
…RESPONDENT (NOTICE TO SOLE RESPONDENT IS SERVED)
Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:2763 WP No. 106661 of 2018
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA., PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS PERTAINING TO O.S.NO.266/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GOKAK AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED COMPROMISE ORDER DATED:13.10.2017 MADE IN O.S.NO.266/2017 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GOKAK PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-"C" SO FAR IT RELATES TO THE SHARES ALLOTTED TO THE PETITIONERS AND THE RESPONDENT ARE CONCERNED BY ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIRARI OR ANY ORDER SUITABLE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIFECTIONS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRL. HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the court to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file an appropriate application before the trial court.
Submission is placed on record.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty.
Sd/- (ASHOK S. KINAGI) JUDGE MBS CT: BSB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4