APHC010869392015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 22/2025 Between: 1. K P REDDY, ( C.2 DIED ) ( APPELLANT NOS. 5 TO 9 ARE THE LRS OF THIS APPELLANT) 2. BANDI PITCHI REDDY, ( C.3 DIED ) ( APPELLANT NOS. 10 AND 11 ARE THE LRS OF THIS APPELLANT) 3. BANDI BALARAMI REDDY, ( C.4 DIED ) ( APPELLANT NOS. 12 85 13 ARE THE LRS OF THIS APPELLANT) 4. CHENNU PENCHALA REDDY, ( C. 11) S/O RAMI REDDY , AGED 48 YEARS, R/O. OBULAYAPALLI VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. BANDI DHANAMMA, (LR OF APPELLANT NO. 1) W/O. PULLA REDDY , AGED 42 YEARS, R/O. KAKUPALLI VILLAGE, TP GUDUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. BANDI SUBHARATHNAMMA, (LR OF APPELLANT 1) W/O. VENKATA REDDY, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. YEPURU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. BANDI MUNI REDDY, (LR OF APPELLANT 1) S/O. SUNDARARAMI REDDY , AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. OBULAYAPALLI VILLAGE,RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. NJS,J & TRR,J LAAS No.22 of 2025 2 8. SWAMA AMARAVATHI, (LR OF APPELLANT NO. 1) W/O. SANJEEVA REDDY, AGED 46 YEARS, R/O. GULIMCHARLA VILLAGE, SYDAPURAM MDL, NELLORE DISTRICT. 9. PUTTAMREDDY BHAVANI, (LR OF APPELLANT NO.L) W/O. NARAYANA REDDY , AGED 42 YEARS, R/O. POTHEGUNTA VILLAGE, SYDAPURAM MDL, NELLORE DISTRICT. 10. BANDI NARASHIMHAPRASAD REDDY, (LR OF APPELLANT NO.2) S/O. PITCHI REDDY , AGED 46 YEARS, R/O. OBULAYAPALLI VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 11. CHINTHAMREDDY KALPANA, (LR OF APPELLANT NO.2) W/O. MOHAN REDDY, AGED 33 YEARS, R/O. BHEEMAVARSIM VILLAGE, NAIDUPETA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 12. BANDI VENKATRATHNAM, (LR OF APPELLANT NO.3) S/O. BALARAMI REDDY , AGED 44 YEARS, R/O. OBULAYAPALLI VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 13. BANDI SUBBMMA, (LR OF APPELLANT NO.3) D/O. BALARAMI REDDY , AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. OBULAYAPALLI VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. APPELLANTS/ LRS OF CLAIMANTS 2 TO 4 ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTORLA, ( LAND ACQUISITION ) TELUGU GANGA PROJECT, NELLORE. 2. KONDLAPUDI PENCHALA REDDY, ( C.1 ) 3. DASARI YANADAIAH, ( C.5 ) 4. KONDA SREENIVASULU, ( C.6 ) 5. KONDA POLAIAH, ( C7 ) 6. KONDLAPUDI RAGHAVA REDDY, ( C.8 ) NJS,J & TRR,J LAAS No.22 of 2025 3 7. THALAMANCHI RAMASUBBA REDDY, ( C.9 ) 8. KETHA VENKU REDDY, ( C. 10 ) ...RESPONDENT(S): pleased to allow the appeal and enhance the compensation in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioners/proposed Appellant Nos.5 to 13 as LRs of deceased claimant Nos.23 and 4 herein to file the above appeal against the Common Order and Decree dated 19.12.2000 passed in LAOP No.27 of 1994 on the file of the Prl Senior Civil Judge Gudur in the interest of justice. IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 2477 days in re-presenting appeal in LAASSR No.14120 of 2015 in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay of 5383 days in preferring appeal against the Judgment Decree dated 19-12-2000 in LAOP No. 27 of 1994 on the file ofand the Honourable Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Gudur and allow the Petitioners to prosecute the present appeal, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. CHETLURU SREENIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR APPEALS The Court made the following: NJS,J & TRR,J LAAS No.22 of 2025 4 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao) Dissatisfied with the compensation granted to the appellants by the Reference Court, for the pomegranate, vide order dated 19.12.2000, in L.A.O.P.No.27 of 1994 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gudur, the present L.A.A.S.No.22 of 2025 came to be filed seeking enhancement of the compensation for the trees. 2. The land of the claimants was acquired by the respondent authorities for Kandaleru Reservoir for foreshore submersion of Telugu Ganga Project. Aggrieved by the award of the Reference Court in not fixing the compensation for trees the present land acquisition appeal is filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity, hereinafter called as „the Act‟) for fixation of compensation for pomegranate trees. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants would submit that this Court, the composite High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad and the Hon‟ble Apex Court have fixed the rate for pomegranate trees @ Rs.3,000/- per tree and for mango trees @ Rs.3,000/- per tree and for coconut trees @ Rs.3,000/- per tree and for sweet orange trees (cheeni trees) @ Rs.4,000/- per tree and hence urged this Court to enhance the compensation for the aforesaid trees and to pass the same orders in the present appeal. 4. The appellants relied on the judgment of this Court in a batch of appeals, vide L.A.A.S.No.35 of 2019 and batch dated 27.09.2023 L.A.A.S.No.61 of 2022 and batch dated 05.10.2023, L.A.A.S.No.31 of 2019 dated 27.06.2019 and in L.A.A.S.No.2 of 2023 dated 04.09.2023 as also the judgment of the Hon‟ble Apex Court in D.Eswara Naidu & ors. Vs. the Special Deputy Collector (L.A.) in Civil Appeal No.11355 of 2018 dated 20.11.2018, the judgment of the composite High Court in The Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), Somasila Project, Unit-IV, Rajampet, Kadapa, Kadapa NJS,J & TRR,J LAAS No.22 of 2025 5 District Vs. Peddireddy Madhava Reddy and others. In the above said judgments, the compensation was fixed @ Rs.3,000/- per each pomegranate, mango tree, acid lime tree, coconut tree, guava, jack-fruit and sapota (sapodilla) and also the trees i.e., drumstick and neredu (black-plum). So far as the tamarind and soap-nut are concerned, the Court has fixed Rs.6,000/- and Rs.5,000/- respectively for each tree. 5. Learned counsel for the appellants further relied on the judgment of this Court in L.A.A.S.No.28 of 2019 and batch dated 05.11.2019, L.A.A.S.No.61 of 2023, L.A.A.S.No.63 of 2022 and the judgment in Pidugu Kondala Rayudu v. Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project Unit, Kadapa reported in (2012) 12 SCC 848. In D. Eswara Naidu & Ors., versus The Special Deputy Collector(L.A.) (in Civil Appeal No. 11355 of 2018) dated 20.11.2018 reported in (2019) 13 SCC 785, the Hon‟ble Supreme Court, inter alia held as follows: “The issue raised in these appeals pertains to the claim made by the appellants for enhancement of compensation for pomegranate trees, which stood in the land acquired for the purpose of Somashila/Telugu Ganga Project. The notifications in these cases have been issued on different dates between 1990 to 1994. The appellants had been granted compensation at the rate of Rs.2000/- per Pomegranate Tree. We find from Civil Appeal Nos.11404-11405 of 2016 that this Court has fixed compensation at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per pomegranate tree, as against the Rs.2000/- fixed by the High Court, in respect of the acquisition for the same project, for which notification was issued in the year 1994. Having regard to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that it would be just, reasonable and proper to fix the compensation at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per NJS,J & TRR,J LAAS No.22 of 2025 6 Pomegranate Tree. Therefore, these appeals are disposed of with the following directions: (i) The appellants shall be entitled to compensation at the rate of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand) per Pomegranate Tree along with all statutory benefits. (ii) However, they shall not be entitled to statutory interest for the period of delay in approaching this Court or the High Court.” 6. In Civil Appeal No.2947 of 2022, the Hon‟ble Apex Court has fixed compensation for the pomegranate trees @ Rs.3,000/- per tree, following the judgment of the Hon‟ble Apex Court in D.Eswara Naidu & ors Vs. The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.) (referred supra), in Civil Appeal No.11355 of 2018, in respect of the very same project. 7. Learned Government Pleader for Appeals contends that the trees existed were pre-bearing trees (plants) and accordingly the value was fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court has rightly answered the said issue and stated that the appellants are not entitled for the enhancement of compensation on the basis of the judgments relied on by the learned counsel for the appellants, as they are pre-bearing trees. Hence, urged this Court to dismiss the appeal. 8. The appellant's counsel has cited a recent decision of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in the case of Mallamputi Ratnamma (Died) by L.R. vs. The Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), rendered in C.A.No.2557 of 2024 on 26.07.2024. In this judgment, the Hon‟ble Supreme Court stated that landowners whose properties have been expropriated are entitled to compensation of Rs.3,000/- per pomegranate tree. For whatever reason, the Supreme Court had framed two additional questions in the order in the Special NJS,J & TRR,J LAAS No.22 of 2025 7 Leave Petition, pertaining to the actual number of pomegranate trees present, and (ii) the number of such trees per acre that were acquired and to resolve these questions, which also serves as the land acquisition court, while providing a fair opportunity for all parties to be heard, specifically directing the Reference Court not to raise any objections regarding limitation. 9. Learned counsel for the appellants also mentioned that some of the claimants had directly approached the Hon‟ble Apex Court through Civil Appeal No(s).4314/2024 or SLP (Civil No.12395/2024) with application I.A.No.193948 of 2024, seeking a direction to refer to the Lok Adalat for the resolution of land acquisition compensation. The said request was made in response to the communication dated 27.08.2024, issued by the Special Collector of the Telugu Ganga Project, Nellore, concerning similar relief as sought in the present appeal before this court. The Apex Court granted the request and directed the claimants to resolve their issue before the Lok Adalat. The order dated 13.09.2024 is outlined below: “Having considered the above, as the present matter pertains to claim for enhancement of compensation for the Pomegranate trees on Nellore District land, acquired from the applicant(s), the IA No. 193948 of 2024 and the main matter stand disposed of, vide order dated 13.09.2024, by permitting the parties to settle their dispute through the Lok Adalat proceedings in the Court at Nellore, as per the proceedings proposed by the Special Collector, in his communication dated 27.08.2024.” 10. Following the direction of the Hon‟ble Apex Court in SLP (Civil No.12395/2024), the District Lok Adalat Bench in Nellore has passed an award vide order dated 05.07.2025, to pay compensation for the trees and also directed to pay compensation for structures and other trees. The NJS,J & TRR,J LAAS No.22 of 2025 8 appellant's counsel fairly stated though the award is silent about specific fixation of the compensation for the pomegranate and other trees, but the compensation was fixed at Rs.2,800/- per tree but requested to grant Rs.3,000/- per pomegranate and coconut trees, contending that the Lok Adalat award is a consent award and it cannot be relied upon. As argued by the appellant‟s counsel and it is well established that a consent award should not be the basis for the passing of the award on merit. 11. In the judgment of the Hon‟ble Apex Court in D.Eswara Naidu & ors Vs. The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.) (referred supra) in Civil Appeal No.11355 of 2018, the Hon‟ble Apex Court has fixed the rate for the pomegranate trees and other trees for the very same Somasila/Telugu Ganga Project @ Rs.3,000/- for pomegranate tree as against Rs.2,000/- and held that the appellants are entitled to compensation @ Rs.3,000/- for pomegranate and coconut trees along with all statutory benefits and also further observed that appellants are not entitled to statutory interest for the period of delay in approaching the High Court. 12. Learned Government Pleader for Appeals has disputed about the number of trees. Therefore, this Court is inclined to allow the appeal on fair admission made by the learned counsel for the appellants that the compensation may be enhanced as per the number of trees as identified by the Land Acquisition Officer in the award, as the appellants have not insisted for grant of compensation for the number of trees which is pleaded by the appellants in the appeal. Therefore, it is made clear that the appellants are entitled to compensation for the total number of trees as identified by the Land Acquisition Officer in the award and not as the total number of trees as the appellants claimed in the Reference Court. NJS,J & TRR,J LAAS No.22 of 2025 9 13. As the claim is only with regard to the trees, the present appeal is allowed in part, enhancing the compensation for each tree as detailed below: Pomegranate trees : Rs.3,000/- per tree; 14. The appellants shall pay the Court fee (if it not paid) on the enhanced compensation amount. The appellants are not entitled to interest during the delay period i.e., 5383 days in preferring the appeal after disposal of the L.A.O.P. by the Reference Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 24.07.2025 Ksj