Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39293 (CHH)

RAJ KUMAR KARMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/8187/2023 · 2025-07-16

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:33762 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8187 of 2023 1 - Raj Kumar Karma S/o Late Bugori Karma Aged About 46 Years Working As Assistant Range Officer, (Forester), Katekalyan, Forest Division Dantewada, District Dantewada (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Forest And Climate Change, Mantralayan, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur , Atal Nagar (C.G.) 2 - The Principal Chief Conservator Of Forests Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur 3 - The Chief Conservator Of Forest Forest Circle Jagdalpur District Bastar (C.G.) 4 - The Divisional Forest Officer Dantewada Forest Division District Dantewada (C.G.) 5 - Shri J.P. Mishra S/o Shri Indrajeet Mishra Aged About 55 Years Deputy Ranger Officer, Office Of The Dfo, Dantewada Forest Division, District Dantewada (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Shri Manoj Chauhan, Advocate For State : Shri Atanu Ghosh, Dy. Government Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 17/07/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.07.26 18:50:03 +0530 2 further submits that the matter relates to transfer of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner has sought following reliefs in this petition: “10.1 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleaded to issue a writ of mandamus quashing the impugned transfer order dated 03/10/2023 (Annexure P/1) so far as it relates to the petitioner. 10.2 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner. 10.3 Any other relief which the Hon’ble Court may deem fit, in the interest of justice.” 3. It has been further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that by afflux of time this petition has become infructuous. He is also having no instructions in this case. Further, there is non-compliance of the Court order dated 13.10.2023, as such in totality there is no merit in this petition. The writ petition is liable to be dismissed and it is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Gopal Singh