Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39286 (ALL)

PHOOLMATIYA AND 3 OTHERS v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONERJUDICIALSECOND VARANASI DIVISION VARANASI AND 13 OTHERS

WRIC/10372/2025 · 2025-04-23

Manish Kumar Nigam

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:62208 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10372 of 2025 Petitioner :- Phoolmatiya And 3 Others Respondent :- Additional Commissionerjudicialsecond Varanasi Division Varanasi And 13 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ankit Shukla,Rajeev Ratan Shukla,Saraswat Prakash Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed for the following relief : "i. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 20.2.2024 passed by the respondent no. 1 in case no. 1235 of 2023 computer case no. C202314000001235 Kapildev and others Vs. Phoolmatiya and others u/s 210 U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 (Annexure.no.1 to the writ petition);" 3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that against the order impugned, the petitioners have an alternative remedy of filing a revision under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 4. Since, the petitioners have an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 5. The present petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to avail the remedy as available to them under the law. Order Date :- 24.4.2025 S. Singh (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad