RANJEET SINGH v. PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION (PSWC), THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER
CWP/8682/2025 · 2025-03-27
Deepinder Singh Nalwa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39284 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39284 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-8682 of 2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 111 CWP-8682 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:27.03.2025 Ranjeet Singh
....Petitioner Versus Punjab State Warehousing Corporation and another .....Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA **** Present: Mr. J. P. Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Kanica Sachdeva, Advocate, for the respondents. **** DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA
, J. (Oral)
1. In the present petition, the petitioner is praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.1 not to effect recovery @60% per month from the salary of the petitioner till the pendency of the statutory appeal dated 24.07.2023 (Annexure P-2) filed by him against the punishment order (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.1 whereby, the recovery of Rs.4,33,23,924/-.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, prays that at this stage, he will be satisfied if a direction may be given to respondent No.2 to decide the appeal filed by the petitioner expeditiously by passing a speaking order, to which learned counsel for the DINESH 2025.03.27 04:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-8682 of 2025 (O&M) 2 respondents has no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-the Appellate Authority to consider and decide the appeal dated 24.07.2023 (Annexure P-2), within a period of 06 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law.
4. Since the statutory appeal is still pending and yet to be decided, it will be in the interest of justice that no further recovery be effected from the petitioner till the disposal of the appeal.
(DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA)
JUDGE March 27, 2025
dinesh Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH 2025.03.27 04:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document