IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 1222 OF 2017 Appeal under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment dated 10- 02-2017 passed in A.S No. 227 of 2010 on the file of XI Additional District & Sessions Judge, Krishna, Gudivada, Confirming the Judgment dated 16-11- 2007 passed in O.S No. 127 of 1996, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Gudivada. Between: 1. Toluganti Sita Maha Lakshmi, W/o. Vijaya Raghava Reddy, age 74 years, Occ; Lands, R/o. Jagampeta, Jagampet Mandal, East Godavari Distrfct. 2. Vinta Anji Reddy, S/o. Malla Reddy age about 66 years, Occ; Cultivation R/o. Telaprolu Village, Unguturu Mandal, Krishna District. ...Appellants/Appellants/Plaintiffs AND 1. Kalakoti Sesharatnam, W/o. Ranga Reddy, age about 63 years, Occ: Lands and Husband’s Protection, R/o. Telaprolu Village, Ungunturu Mandal, Gannavaram. 2. Tiyyagura Venkata Subbareddy, S/o. Late Venkata Reddy, age about 48 years, Occ: Lands, C/o. B.Subba Reddy, Amulya Milk Diary Product, 9^ Eluru Road, Near Anjaneya Swamy Temple Centre, Vijayawada Krishna District. 3. Kalakoti Venkata Rami Reddy, S/o. not known, age about 97 years, Occ: Cultivation R/o. Kunderu Village, Kankipadu Mandal, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 4. Kalakoti Chandra Sekhara Reddy, S/o. Venkata Reddy, age about 65 years, Occ; Cultivation R/o. D.No. 2/156, Nunna, Vijayawada Mandal, Krishna District. 5. Guntaka Vara Lakshmi, W/o. Siva Brahma Reddy, age about 56 years, Occ: Husband's Protection, R/o. Peda Ogirala, Vuyyuru Mandal, Krishna District. ...Respondents/Respondents/Defendants I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fSAMP. NO: 2470 OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 111 days in resubmitting the SA.SR No. 20142 of 2017. LA, NO: 2 OF 2017rSAMP. NO: 2471 OF 2017t Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent/defendant charge or mortgage the Schedule property to any 3rd parties. Pending disposal of Appeal. not to alienate, create. Counsel for the Appellants: Sri K V L Narasimha Rao Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Sri Paladugu Ganesh Counsel for other Respondents: None Appeared The Court made the following: JUDGMENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL No.1222 of 2017 ORDER: When the matter has been taken up today, learned counsel for the appellant(s) seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Appeal. To that effect, learned counsel for the appellant(s) also endorsed on the grounds of appeal. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Recording the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER SE To, 1. The XI Additional District & Sessions Judge, Gudivada, Krishna District. 2. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gudivada, Krishna District. 3. One CC to Sri K V L Narasimha Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri Paladugu Ganesh, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Three CD Copies SAM vna ^ . i HIGH COURT DATED;21/01/2025 JUDGMENT SA.No.1222 of 2017 ^Of ANDA^ :.g 2 7 JAN 2125 C9/‘ ^ Current Section DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS