Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39283 (PNJ)

SHIV KUMAR v. STATE OF HRY. AND ORS.

CWP/11172/2006 · 2025-05-02

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-11172-2006 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 104 CWP-11172-2006 (O&M). Date of Decision: 02.05.2025. SHIV KUMAR ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ***** Present: Mr. N.K. Malhotra, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner. Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG, Haryana. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. J (ORAL). CM-6289-CWP-2025 The present misc. application has been filed by the applicant- petitioner for seeking disposal of the main writ petition in terms of the judgment passed in the matter of Sarbans Singh and others Vs. The State of Haryana and others, CWP No.11710-2014, decided on 25.03.2025 along with other connected matters. RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.05.05 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-11172-2006 (O&M) -2- 2 Learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner submits that the main writ petition was admitted vide order dated 06.09.2007 and is pending on the Regular Board of this Court at Sr. No.1289. He submits that the controversy in dispute in the writ petition is covered by the ratio of the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Sarbans Singh and others Vs. The State of Haryana and others, CWP No.11710-2014, decided on 25.03.2025 along with other connected matters. He therefore prays that the present application be allowed; the main writ petition be taken on board today itself and disposed of accordingly. 3 Notice in the application. 4 Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG, Haryana, enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. She does not dispute that the ratio of judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Sarbans Singh and others (supra) would be applicable to the facts of the present case. She submits that she has no objection in the case the present application is allowed and the main writ petition which was admitted vide order dated 06.09.2007 is taken on Board today itself and is disposed of accordingly. 5 Accordingly, the present application is allowed. The main case is taken up on Board today itself. RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.05.05 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-11172-2006 (O&M) -3- Main case 6 Prayer made in the present writ petition is for setting aside the order dated 14.02.2006 (Annexure P-4) vide which the Electrician Scale has been denied to the petitioner. 7 Disposed of in terms of the judgment passed in the matter of Sarbans Singh and others (supra). May 02, 2025 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.05.05 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document