Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39278 (CHH)

DHAJARAM SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1782/2022 · 2025-07-08

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:31527-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1782 of 2022 Dhajaram Sahu S/o Pakluram Sahu Aged About 55 Years R/o Suhela Police Station Suhela, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary Society, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Superintendent Of Police, Baloda Bazar -Bhatapara,, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sation House Officer, P.S. Suhela, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 4 - Nem Singh Baghmar S/o Late Shri Bhuneshwar Prasad Baghmar Occupation-President Of Primary Agriculture Credit Cooperative Society Maryadit, Suhela, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. R/o Khapradih P.S. Suhela, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohan Kumbhare, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 to 3/State: Mr. Soumya Rai, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Aditya Dhar Diwan, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.07.10 10:39:04 +0530 2 Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 09.07.2025 1. Heard Mr. Rohan Kumbhare, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Soumya Rai, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent No.1 / State as well as Mr. Aditya Dhar Diwan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.2 to 4. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “It is therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the FIR No. 0095/2022 dated 11.04.2022 (AnnexureP/1), in the ends of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present petition stating that in the present matter, charges have been framed against the petitioner. 4. In view of the same, as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet