APHC010871212016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3367] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 19/2016 Between: Chole Venkata Rajendra Prasad, Krishna Dist. ...PETITIONER AND P P Hyd 2 Othrs and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T D PANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The present Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner against the order, dated 09.12.2015 in Crl.M.P.No.931 of 2015 in M.C.No.47 of 2015 passed by the learned Judge Family Court-cum-IV Additional District & Sessions Judge, Vijayawada. 2. Sri A. Sree Ram, learned counsel representing Sri T. D. Phani Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M. Yuvasiva Swamy, learned counsel representing Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva, learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 are present. 3. Sri M. Yuvasiva Swamy, learned counsel submits that he sent a letter to Respondent No.2 and even after receipt of the same, he did not turn up. He filed a certified copy of an order passed in Crl.M.P.No.1029 of 2015 in M.C.No.47 of 2015 before this Court, which shows that a settlement was arrived between both the parties and the respondent i.e., who is petitioner herein agreed and paid Rs.40,000/- to the petitioner therein i.e., Chole Narayana Rao, towards full and final settlement as permanent alimony and the petitioner therein received the same. The petitioner therein further agreed that he would not claim any further maintenance against the respondent therein and the said settlement was recorded under Sections 9 (1) and 10 (3) of Family Court Act, 1984. 4. From the above, it is clear that the matter has been settled between the parties and in view of the same, no further cause survive in the present case. 5. Accordingly, the present Criminal Revision Case is closed. Interim orders granted earlier if any, shall stand vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS Date: 12.02.2025 KNN