Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39277 (CHH)

AASHKARAN JOSHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/8189/2023 · 2025-10-06

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:49917 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8189 of 2023 1 - Aashkaran Joshi S/o Shri Devi Prasad Joshi Aged About 33 Years Presently Posted At Govt. Primary School Tikrapara, Dongargarh Block Chhuriya, R/o Village Narayangan, Tahsil Dongargarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 2 - Dhannau Ram Chandravanshi S/o Shri Babulal Aged About 36 Years Presently Posted As Primary School Baniatola Block Chhuriya, R/o Village Jarhamarka, Post Shikari Mahaka, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sanjay Kumar Korra S/o Shri Ramadhar Korram Aged About 39 Years Presently Posted At Govt. Primary School Matekheda Block Chhuriya, R/o Village Bankal Post Paneka, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Karuna Chandrakar S/o Shri Nand Kumar Chandrakar Aged About 40 Years Presently Posted At Primary School Anjora, Rajnandgaon, R/o Village Bharregaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate Public Education, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 3 - Joint Director Education Division- Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector Rajnandgaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 5 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Rajnandgaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 6 - District Education Officer Rajnandgaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 7 - Block Education Officer Chhuriya, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 07.10.2025 1. This matter was called for hearing today. Despite two calls, no representation has been made on behalf of the petitioner. The counsel for the petitioner has failed to appear without any explanation. 2. In view of the petitioner’s non-prosecution and failure to prosecute the matter diligently, this petition is hereby dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena