APHC010854052018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 41142/2018 Between: 1. ST. JOSEPH OF ANNECY (INDIA) EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, ST JOSEPHS CONVENT, REP. BY ITS MANAGER SR. LUCY JOSEPH D/O LATE C.C.CHERIAN, AGE 63 YEARS, R/O BHUBANESWAR, DIST.-KHURDA, ODISHA ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIZIANAGARAM 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, VIZIANAGARAM 5. THE DEPUTY DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, VIZIANAGARAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the high handed action of the 3rd respondent in issuing instruction vide proceedings Rc.No.852/A3/2017 dated 26.10.2018 to the 4th respondent, consequently the 4th respondent issued letter Rc.No.2879/A3/2017 dated 03.11.2018 is arbitrary, bad and illegal, without jurisdiction, irrational and violation of Article 14 of The Constitution of India and also contrary to the Article 30(1) of The Constitution of India Consequently set aside the same in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KURITI BHASKARA RAO 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the high handed action of the 3rd respondent in issuing instruction vide proceedings Rc.No.852/A3/2017 dated 26.10.2018 to the 4th respondent, consequently the 4th respondent issued letter Rc.No.2879/A3/2017 dated 03.11.2018 is arbitrary, bad and illegal, without jurisdiction, irrational and violation of Article 14 of The Constitution of India and also contrary to the Article 30(1) of The Constitution of India Consequently set aside the same in the interest of justice ...” 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the subject matter of this Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Government Pleader for School Education is in attendance. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 41142 of 2018 04.07.2025 Mjl /*