Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39276 (ALL)

SMT. GEETA SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

WRIA/65896/2008 · 2025-04-30

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:68614 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 65896 of 2008 Petitioner :- Smt. Geeta Sharma Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.P. Dubey,M.P. Tiwari,Som Veer Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,R.K. Malviya,Vishistha Tewari Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Sri Som Veer, learned counsel for petitioner and Ms. Raj Laxmi Sinha, learned Standing Counsel. 2. Petitioner has not worked from 2004 to at least 2008 and an explanation that she was not allowed to mark her attendance for such a long period without any substantial material was rejected being absolutely vague by the impugned order. 3. In aforesaid circumstances, Court is amazed as to how petitioner has worked or got salary till her superannuation without any order in regard to above referred break in service, therefore, without interfering with impugned order, while disposing of this writ petition, it is directed that Director of Education (Basic) will initiate inquiry not only against petitioner but against concerned B.S.A. also that under what circumstances, without considering above referred break in service, payment of salary was made 4. Without interfering with impugned order, this writ petition is disposed of. 5. Registrar (Compliance) to take steps. Order Date :- 1.5.2025 Sinha_N. Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad