Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39272 (JHR)

NAMIT JAISWAL @ NAMIT KUMAR JAISWAL @ NAMIT KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8530/2025 · 2025-11-14

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:34025 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 8530 of 2025 Namit Jaiswal @ Namit Kumar Jaiswal @ Namit Kumar, aged about 35 years, son of Late Binod Jaiswal, resident of Mahagama, P.O. & P.S.- Mahagama, District- Godda. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Upendra Sah, son of Late Narayan Sah, resident of Bhatdiha, Godda Town, P.O. & P.S.- Godda, District- Godda. …. Opp. Parties ------ CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rishu Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Mahesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Gaurav Priyadarshi, Advocate Ms. Twinkle Ravi, Advocate Mr. Anup Kumar Yadav, Advocate ----- 4/ 14.11.2025 Heard the parties. 2. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No. 201 of 2022 for the offences registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of Sri Satish Kumar Munda, learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Godda. 3. The petitioner is alleged to be running Manav Sewa Swalalmvi Co-operative Committee Society. He had taken money from several members of the Society. It is alleged that the petitioner had misappropriated the deposited amount. 4. It was submitted that the petitioner has taken Rs. 26,150/- from the informant and he has returned the same. 5. Attention has been drawn towards the account details, which is Annexure-S/1 of the supplementary affidavit. It appears that the money has been transferred to the account of the informant. 6. Learned counsel appearing for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner is an accused in as many as eight cases. 7. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been released on bail in all the cases. It was further submitted that all the cases are arising out of the same transaction. It was finally submitted that the petitioner is in custody since last six months. 8. In view of the submission made above, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Sri Satish Kumar Munda, learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Godda, or his successor, in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No. 201 of 2022. (Ambuj Nath, J.) R.Kr. 14.11.2025