APHC010855832018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 41358/2018 Between: 1. K. L. DEVI @ AYESHA BANU, W/O RASOOL, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.19-4-319-12, UPSTAIRS, BHAVANI NAGAR (ARAVETI NAGAR), ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2. S. NAZIYA, W/O MAHAMOOD AZHAR, AGED 23 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.19-4-319-11-C, BHAVANI NAGAR (ARAVETI NAGAR), ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3. S. GULNAZ BEGUM, W/O S. MAHAMOOD AKRAM, AGED 20 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.19-12-370-B, BHAVANI NAGAR (ARAVETI NAGAR), ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. P. RAMYASREE, W/O L. JAGADEESH, AGED 25 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.13-3-107, UPSTAIRS, SRINIVASA NAGAR, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 5. V. L. KAMESWARI, W/O LATE SRINIVAS, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.13-3-107, SRINIVASA NAGAR, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 6. C. RAMA KRISHNA, S/O LAKSHMANNA, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.17-1-65-19, VENUGOPAL NAGAR, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 7. P. RASHMI, W/O P. NARASIMHUDU, AGED 47 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.13-2-578, SRINIVASA NAGAR, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 8. Y. ANSARJAN, W/O HUSSAIN SAHEB.M, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O 2 DOOR NO.17-1-225-5, VENUGOPAL NAGAR, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 9. Y. YELLAPPA, S/O SUBBANNA, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O D.NO.13-2- 404, SRINIVASA NAGAR, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I-TOWN POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 5. GOUSMOHIDDIN, S/O NOT KNOWN, INSPECTOR WAQF BOARD, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 6. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANANTAPUR DIVISION, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 7. SUDHAKAR REDDY, S/O VENKATA RAMI REDDY, AGED MAJOR, R/O D.NO.19/4/305, BHAVANINAGAR (ARAVETI NAGAR), ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 8. V BHASKAR, S/O V. NAGAPPA, AGED MAJOR, R/O D.NO.9-4-303, BHAVANINAGAR (ARAVETI NAGAR), ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 9. PANDURANGA, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED MAJOR, R/O D.NO.9-4-74, BHAVANINAGAR (ARAVETI NAGAR), ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to pass an order or direction or any other proceedings one in the 3 nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not initiating any action against the respondents No.7 to 9 and not preventing the 4th respondent from interfering in the Civil Dispute as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14, 16 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to register a case against the respondents No.7 to 9 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to interfere in the Civil Dispute to evict the petitioners from the property, not to force the petitioners to enter into a compromise with the respondents No.7 to 9 pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G R SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 4 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “….to pass an order or direction or any other proceedings one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not initiating any action against the respondents No.7 to 9 and not preventing the 4th respondent from interfering in the Civil Dispute as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14, 16 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to register a case against the respondents No.7 to 9 and pass.…” 2. Heard Sri G.R.Sudhakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are not registering the case against respondent Nos.7 to 9 and the 4th respondent is interfering in the civil dispute at the instance of respondent Nos.7 to 9. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil dispute. 5. Considering the submissions made, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 21.07.2025 MH 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 126 WRIT PETITION NO: 41358/2018 Dt.21.07.2025 MH