Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39266 (RAJ)

SATISH KUMAR VASHISHTH S/O RADHEY SHYAM VASHISHTH v. PRABANDH SAMITI

CW/17346/2025 · 2025-11-14

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45970] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17346/2025 Satish Kumar Vashishth S/o Radhey Shyam Vashishth, Aged About 58 Years, R/o A-104, Jagdamba Nagar, Behind Heerapura Power House, Ajmer Road, Jaipur-302021 ----Petitioner Versus 1. Prabandh Samiti, Adarsh Vidya Mandir, Through Its Secretary, Having Its Office At Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur. 2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. District Education Officer, Jaipur. 4. Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Jaipur 5. Vandana Mehrotra, R/o 77/21, Near Veer Teja Ji Road, Mansrovar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghu Nandan Sharma with Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, Ms. Kritika Rajawat and Mr. Nikhil Kumawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 14/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is filed by petitioner with following prayer:- i. Quash and set aside the impugned order dated 07.10.2025 (Annexure-5) passed by respondent No. 1, removing the petitioner from membership of the Society as Teacher Representative. ii. Declare that suspension from service does not disentitle the petitioner from continuing as Teacher Representative in the Prabandh Samiti, Adarsh Vidya Mandir, so long as he remains in service. [2025:RJ-JP:45970] (2 of 2) [CW-17346/2025] iii. Direct the respondents to restore the Direct the respondents petitioner as Teacher Representative in the Society Prabandh Samiti, Adarsh Vidya Mandir forthwith and allow him to participate in its meetings and decisions. iv. By an appropriate writ, order or direction may kindly be declared illegal respondent No.5 as member in place of petitioner in Prabandh Samiti, Adarsh Vidya Mandir as teacher representative. 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner offers to withdraw instant writ petition with liberty to pursue efficacious and alternative remedy available to the petitioner under the law. 3. Having considered aforesaid, instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /397-S