Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39261 (RAJ)

RANDHEER SINGH S/O BHANSINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4397/2025 · 2025-10-16

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42503] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4397/2025 Randheer Singh S/o Bhansingh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o C-312 Om Enclave Jhalawar Road Anantpura Tahsil Ladpura District Kota Rajasthan. ----Accused-Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Non-Applicant For Applicant(s) : Mr. Rahil Kalam Khan for Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan For Non-Applicant(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 16/10/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 372/2024 registered at Police Station Suket, District Kota Rural for the offence(s) under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that vide interim order dated 08.09.2025 it was directed to the applicant to join investigation. It is contended that neither applicant is having any criminal antecedents moreover in compliance of the directions encapsulated in order dated 08.09.2025, the applicant has joined and cooperated in the investigation. It is further submitted that the said order be made [2025:RJ-JP:42503] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4397/2025] absolute as prima facie his contention is that the matter is purely civil in nature and pertaining to breach of trust. 3. Per contra, learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that on 06.10.2025, the petition filed by the accused - applicant (S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.8469/2024) under Section 528 BNSS/482 Cr.P.C was dismissed as withdrawn after arguing for some time. 4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel representing the parties, and considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it appropriate to make the order dated 08.09.2025 absolute and allow the anticipatory bail application. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Suket, District Kota Rural in F.I.R. No. 372/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicant Randheer Singh S/o Bhansingh, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and [2025:RJ-JP:42503] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4397/2025] (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/425