SRI. GYAN PRAKASH ARYA v. M/S. TITAN COMPANY LTD.,
WP/15480/2023 · 2025-09-24
M Nagaprasanna
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39259 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39259 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39259 WP No. 15480 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 15480 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. GYAN PRAKASH ARYA S/O LATE SATYAPRAKASH ARYA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS SOLE PROPRIETOR M/S R M JEWELLERY 3RD FLOOR, TATVAMM HOUSE NO.81, VEERA PILLAI STREET BANGALORE - 560 042
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SRIKANTH M.P., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39259 WP No. 15480 of 2023
AND:
1.
M/S. TITAN COMPANY LTD., TOWER A GOLDEN ENCLAVE AIRPORT ROAD REP BY ITS PA HOLDER AND LANE OFFICER SRI. T. SRINIVAS
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. MANU PRABHAKAR KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 27.06.2023 AND 14.07.2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-AF PASSED BY THE HON'BLE COURT OF LXXXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE ON COMMERCIAL EXECUTION NO.46/2020.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39259 WP No. 15480 of 2023
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court, seeking the following prayer:
"a) Set aside the Order dated 27.06.2023 in I.A.No.10 and 11 and 14.07.2023 vide ANNEXURE-AE passed by the Hon'ble Court of CCH-84 LXXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (Commercial Court) on Com- Execution No.46/2020, in the ends of justice. b) Pass any order of consequential relief or any other appropriate order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in the ends of justice and equity."
2. Heard Sri. M.P. Srikanth, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri. Manu Prabhakar Kulkarni, , learned counsel appearing for the respondent and have perused the material on record.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit the learned counsel for the respondent had submitted that, if another Rs.50,000/- is paid, it would suffice and the matter could be closed, which is also paid during the subsistence of the petition.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39259 WP No. 15480 of 2023
4. In that light, learned counsel appearing for the parties would submit that the order be set aside and the matter be treated as closed between the parties.
5. Therefore, in the light of the said submission, I deem it appropriate to pass the following:
ORDER (i) The petition is allowed. (ii) The orders dated 27.06.2023 in I.A.Nos.10 and 11 and 14.07.2023 passed on Commercial Execution No.46/2020 by the LXXXVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-84, stand quashed. (iii) In the light of the compliance as observed hereinabove, the matter stands closed between the parties on all counts.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39259 WP No. 15480 of 2023
Ordered accordingly.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
SJK CT-SG List No.: 5 Sl No.: 1