Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39254 (KAR)

SRI R G PRASAD v. M/S MAHABALA DYE CHEM

CRL.P/5292/2025 · 2025-09-23

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38249 CRL.P No. 5292 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5292 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI. R G PRASAD S/O LATE H.R. RAMACHANDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT NO. 671, 6TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN ROAD, HANUMANTHANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 019. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.L. SREENIVAS, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S MAHABALA DYE CHEM NO. 72, 3RD CROSS, LAL BAGH ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027. R/BY ITS PARTNER, 2. SMT. R SUDHA W/O C RAJASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, 3. SRI. C RAJASHEKAR S/O LATE C.R. CHANDRANNA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, BOTH RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 3 ARE Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38249 CRL.P No. 5292 of 2025 PARTNERS OF M/S MAHABALA DYE CHEM, AND R/AT NO. 623, 4TH CROSS, 4TH MAIN, HANUMANTHANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 019. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VINAY KUTTAPPA K.S, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED IN PCR NO.279/2018 BY THE HONBLE XVI A.C.M.M BENGALURU DATED 20.07.2022 DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT FOR NON PROSECUTION FILED AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I ACT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for respondent no.2 has brought to the notice of this Court that this petition is not maintainable in view of the petitioner having availed the remedy of revision under Section 397 of Cr.P.C., assailing the same order which is impugned in the captioned petition. On instructions, he also submits that both the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38249 CRL.P No. 5292 of 2025 counsels have already addressed their arguments in the pending revision petition. Recording his submission, the captioned petition is dismissed. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11 CT: BHK