Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39253 (BOM)

SHIVAJI GOVIND MALI v. SHIVAJI NANA MALI AND ANR.

SA/338/2003 · 2025-07-02

Shri Madhav J Jamdar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

232-SA-338-2003.doc Arjun IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.338 OF 2003 Shivaji Govind Mali …Appellants (since deceased by his heirs) 1a. Shanta Shivaji Mali & Ors. Versus Shivaji Nana Mali …Respondents Since deceased by his Heirs (1a) Kamal Shivaji Mali & Ors. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1354 OF 2002 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.338 OF 2003 Shivaji Govind Mali …Applicant Versus Shivaji Nana Mali …Respondents Since deceased by his Heirs (1a) Kamal Shivaji Mali & Ors. _______________________________________________________________ None for the Appellant/Applicant. Ms. Sampada S. Patil i/b Kuldeep S. Patil, for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. _______________________________________________________________ CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED: 02 JULY 2025 P.C.: 1. This matter was called out in the morning session. As none appeared for the Appellant in the morning session, the same has been kept back in the afternoon session. In the afternoon session also none appears for the Appellant. 1 ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Digitally signed by ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date: 2025.07.02 21:04:52 +0530 232-SA-338-2003.doc 2. Accordingly, Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. As the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, nothing survives in the Civil Application and the same is also disposed of. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] 2