Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:2628 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1/441/2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Lalit Sharma and Ms. Shreya Yadav,
learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Siddharath Bisht, learned Assistant Government Advocate for the State.
3. Present applicant is seeking regular bail in relation to FIR dated 31.01.2025 bearing FIR No. 0047 of 2025, registered at Police Station – Nehru Colony, District – Dehradun wherein applicant has been implicated for the offences punishable under Section 308 (5), 351 (2), 352, 3 (5) BNS, 2023 and under Section 66-D of the IT Act.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and applicant is not named in the FIR. In the FIR, four mobile phones were mentioned, which does not belong to the present applicant. He further submits that without collecting credible evidence, applicant has been arrested and not a single money has been credited in his account. He further submits that only on the basis of statement made by co-accused Sachin, applicant has been implicated. Learned counsel for the applicant apprise this Court that applicant is student of graduation pursing ITI in Mechanical Engineering. He further submits that for the same case crime no. 47 of 2025, one FIR has been registered in Ranchi.
5. On the other hand, learned State Counsel has placed before this Court account statement of co- accused Sachin. On perusal of the account statement it reveals that money was transferred in the account of co-accused Sachin on 06.01.2025 and not in the account of present applicant.
6. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that there is no such document which reveals that amount has been credited in the account of present applicant, therefore, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves for bail. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant “Pawan Kumar” be released on bail, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
2025:UHC:2628
8. After being released on bail, applicant will cooperate with the investigating agency, since investigation is still going on against the other co- accused in order to assist the I.O. to collect the credible evidence against main culprit.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
08.04.2025. SKS