[2025:RJ-JP:50166] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19233/2025 Praveen Singh S/o Lt. Surendra Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 1193/28 Aadarsh Nagar, Ajmer. Presently Resides At Village Paranga Tehsil Roopangarh, District Ajmer (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Anil Kumar Sujanti S/o Lt. Shri Kanhaiyalal, Aged About 52 Years, R/o 4/263, Lakhan Kotri, Ajmer 2. Sunil Kumar Sujanti S/o S/o Lt. Shri Kanhaiyalal, Aged About 52 Years, R/o 4/263, Lakhan Kotri, Ajmer 3. Sumer Singh S/o Mohabbat Singh (Deceased), Through Lrs. 3/1 Smt. Kanchan Kanwar, W/o Lt. Shri Sumer Singh 3/2 Shailendra Singh, S/o Lt. Shri Sumer Singh 3/3 Vikram Singh, S/o Lt. Shri Sumer Singh 3/4 Daljeet Singh, S/o Lt. Shri Sumer Singh 3/5 Kusum Kanwar D/o Lt. Shri Sumer Singh, All R/o 2354/28 Paranga House, Shalimar Colony, Aadarsh Nagar, Ajmer 4. Rajendra Singh Rathore S/o Lt. Shri Mohabbat Singh (Deceased), Through Lrs 4/1 Smt. Madhu Kanwar, Aged About 55 Years, W/o Lt. Shri Rajendra Singh 4/2 Randhir Singh, Aged About 33 Years, S/o Lt. Shri Rajendra Singh 4/3 Bhawani Singh S/o Lt. Shri Rajendra Singh, Aged About 30 Years, All R/o 1193/28, Adarsh Nagar Nasirabad Road Ajmer. 4/4 Smt. Ranjana Kanwar W/o Shri Banne Singh, D/o Lt. Shri Rajendra Singh, R/o Village Borekheda, District Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harsh Dadhich For Respondent(s) : [2025:RJ-JP:50166] (2 of 3) [CW-19233/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Order 10/12/2025 1. In the instant writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 28.10.2025 passed by the learned Appellate Rent Tribunal, Ajmer in Rent Appeal No.45/2017 whereby, the petitioner’s application under order 1 Rule 10 CPC was dismissed by the learned Rent Appellate Tribunal seeking impleadment as party-appellant in the appeal. 2. The brief facts of the case are that an eviction petition was filed by respondents No.1 and 2 against respondents No.3 and 4. The eviction petition was decreed in favour of respondents No.1 and 2. Appeal filed by respondent No. 3 and 4, during the pendency of the appeal filed by respondents No.3 and 4, an application came to be filed by the petitioner claiming that the property in dispute had been purchased for Rs.30,000/- by the petitioner’s grandfather, Late Mohhabat Singh. It was further asserted that, being a co-owner, the petitioner has a right in the property, which he has been utilizing peacefully, and therefore, he is entitled to be impleaded as an appellant in the pending first rent appeal. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the learned Rent Appellate Tribunal, without considering the material aspects, has rejected the application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. 4. Heard. 5. From the perusal of the record, it transpires that the decree of eviction was passed against respondents No.3 and 4 vide judgment dated 16.05.2017, against which an Appeal bearing [2025:RJ-JP:50166] (3 of 3) [CW-19233/2025] No.45/2017 was filed. During the pendency of the appeal, an application came to be filed by the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC seeking to implead himself as a party after 8 years of pendency of appeal. 6. This Court further finds that there is not even a single averment in the petitioner’s application, that he was residing with his grandfather, Mohhabat Singh, and thereafter, with his father, Surendra Singh, as a tenant in the disputed property during their lifetime and after death. It has also not been pleaded that the petitioner is in possession of the disputed property as a tenant. In the absence of such pleadings, no right accrues to the petitioner to seek impleadment as a tenant in the disputed property. Therefore, the learned trial Court has rightly rejected the application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. 7. This Court finds that the application was not only filed at a highly belated stage but was also wholly misconceived. 8. For the reasons mentioned above, this writ petition is dismissed. 9. All pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J MAHIMA/14