Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39245 (RAJ)

RAJEEV KUMAR JATAV SON OF SHRI GYANSINGH JATAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/19460/2025 · 2025-12-10

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:50280] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19460/2025 Rajeev Kumar Jatav Son Of Shri Gyansingh Jatav, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Village Machadi, Tehsil Todabhim, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Inspector General Of Police (Recruitment), Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Commissioner, Police Commissionrate, Jaipur-17, (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Beri For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 10/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that your lordship may graciously be pleased to issue and allow this writ petition and - (1)-Issue a writ order or direction in the nature thereof direct the respondents to fixed the date of physical of petitioner after 3 months Due to a fracture in the petitioner's right knee, not cancel the candidature of petitioner on account of her non appearance in PET/PST schedule and given appointment to petitioner on the [2025:RJ-JP:50280] (2 of 2) [CW-19460/2025] post of Constable under advertisement dated 09.04.2025 in the larger interest of justice. (ii). Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, kindly be passed in favour of the may petitioner..” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider his grievances, and provide opportunity to reappear in PET/PST exam. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days on all grounds along with documents and the respondents- Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /35