- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35553 CRL.P No. 11503 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11503 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. CHANDRASHEKARAIAH N R AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE RUDRAIAH 2. C.VINAY AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, S/O CHANDRASHEKARAIAH N.R BOTH ARE RESIDING AT PUTTAVEERAMMA COMPOUND, 1ST CROSS, SOMESHWARA LAYOUT, TUMAKURU-572101. 3. LOKESHWARAIAH B.H AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O ADAVAPPA H R/AT RAJEEVA B BLOCK, SHARADADEVI NAGARA, BELAGUMBA ROAD, TUMAKURU-572101. 4. SRINIVASA M.C AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O CHIKKAVENKATARAYYAPPA, R/AT SRI LAKSHMI NIVASA, NEW EXTENSION, DEVARAYAPATTANA, TUMAKURU-572101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHANDRAHASA RAI B, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35553 CRL.P No. 11503 of 2023 AND: 1. THE STATE BY TUMAKURU RURAL P S TUMAKURU, REPT BY STATE PUBLIC, PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001. 2. C. BHADRARADHYA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, S/O LATE G. GANGADHARAIAH, R/AT NO.211, BOVIPALYA, N.H-4, OORUKERE, TUMAKURU-572106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.LAKSHMAN, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.4039/2016 PENDING ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., TUMAKURU ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.445/2013 DATED 12.12.2013 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 417, 420, 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC REGISTERED BY TUMAKURU RURAL POLICE, TUMAKURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioners. 2. No representation for petitioners even in the afternoon session. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35553 CRL.P No. 11503 of 2023 3. Vide order dated 17.07.2025, a conditional order was passed by granting two weeks' time to comply with the office objections, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. Despite the same, the office objections are not complied with. 4. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default. 5. In view of the disposal of petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate order is required. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE ASN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8