2025:JHHC:24823 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 632 of 2025 ------ Pandey Janardan Prasad Sinha, aged about 87 years, son of Late Rajeshwari Prasad, resident of Kishoreganj, PO-GPO, PS, Sukhdeonagar, District-Ranchi. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Sri Shashi Ranjan, son of not known to the petitioner, Deputy Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, PO & PS-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 3. Sri Utkarsh Gupta, son of not known to the petitioner, Director of Secondary Education, Human Resources Development Department, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, PO & PS- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 4. Sri Vishal Bansal, son of not known to the petitioner, Accountant General, Bihar, Patna, PO & PS- Patna, District- Patna, Bihar. 5. Sri Raj Kumar Agarwal, son of not known to the petitioner, Accountant General, Jharkhand, Ranchi. PO & PS- Doranda, District-Ranchi. 6. Mrs. Alka Jaiswal, son of not known to the petitioner Regional Deputy Director of Education (Chhotanagpur Division) PO.GPO, PS. Kotwali, District- Ranchi. 7. Sri Pravin Kerketta, son of not known to the petitioner, District- Education Officer (Gumla), Simdega, PO & PS., Gumla, District-Gumla. 8. Sri Mithlesh Kerketta, son of not known to the petitioner, District- Treasury Officer, Simdega, PO & PS. Simdega, District- Simdega. 9. Mrs. Saroj Tirkey, wife of not known to the petitioner, District Treasury Officer, Ranchi, PO & PS- Doranda, District- Ranchi. … … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Samir Kumar Lall, Advocate For the Opp. Party(s) : Mr. Kishore Kr Singh, Advocate Mr. Amit Kr. Verma, Advocate ------ 04/ 22nd August,2025 1. This application has been filed alleging commission of contempt by the opposite parties as the order dated 29.04.2024 passed in W.P. (S) No.6232 of 2022 has not been complied. In the writ petition there was a direction to pay the interests. 2. Show Cause has been filed by the authority/opposite party No.7. In paragraph Nos.13 & 14 of the show cause, the following has been submitted by opposite party: - 2025:JHHC:24823 2 “13. In compliance of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble High Court, Jharkhand, Ranchi, a total of Rs.1,57,845 has been paid for the delayed payment of Rs.1,95,953 and Rs.55,803 at the rate of 6% interest through the bill number-81/2024-25 dated 02.09.2024 of District Education Officer, Simdega. Thus the judgment passed by the Hon’ble High Court has been fully complied with. 14. That it is most humbly submitted that the remaining amount of Rs.3749, earned leave has also been paid by the District Education Officer, Simdega, and was notified to the Directorate vide letter no.1486 dated 24.09.2024.” 3. After going through the paragraph No.13 & 14, I am of the opinion that the order has been complied with, thus no contempt is made out, accordingly, this contempt is dropped. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Sandeep cp2