Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010838992018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 40650/2018
Between:
1. GANGAIAH, S/O. VENKATESHULU, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, WO. KRISHNARAJAPURAM VILLAGE, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. JAYARAM, S/O. GOWRAPPA GOUD, AGED 24 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, KRISHNARAJAPURAM VILLAGE, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, VIJYAWADA AT KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE
3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANATHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. Y V RAMANA, HEAD CONSTABLE, RAMAKUPPAM POLICE STATION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2
6. G MUNEMMA, W/O. GOWRAPPA GOUD, KRISHNARAJAPURAM VILLAGE, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action the respondents 2 to 4 in not disposing the petitioners representation dated 09.10.2018 is illegal, arbitrary and principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to implement the Hon’ble Apex Court Judgment (Smt. Selvi and Others Vs. State of Karnataka) reported in 2010 (7) SCC page 263 and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2to 4 to consider and dispose of the representation dated 09.10.2018 of the petitioner pending disposal writ petition, and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. PRAKASH C
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 40650 of 2018 The Court made the following Order:
This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 23.07.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation for the petitioners. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 29.07.2025 PSA
4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 40650 of 2018
Date: 29.07.2025 PSA