Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39233 (RAJ)

ANSHU S/O FATEH SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12991/2025 · 2025-11-12

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45405] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12991/2025 Anshu S/o Fateh Singh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Pur, Police Station Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa, District Dausa) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 12/11/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.109/2025 registered at Police Station Mahuwa, District Dausa for offence under Section 109(1), 352 BNS, 2023 and Section 3/25 of Arms Act, 1959 (Amendment 2019). 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that no recovery has been effected from the possession of the petitioner and no specific act was attributed to him. He argued that pistol was recovered from co-accused Ankit and specific act of firing has also been assigned to said Ankit. He again submits that petitioner is behind the bars since 30.07.2025 and charge-sheet [2025:RJ-JP:45405] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12991/2025] has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Anshu S/o Fateh Singh, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg /124