Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39232 (CHH)

PRADEEP YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/8151/2023 · 2025-07-21

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:35144 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8151 of 2023 Pradeep Yadav S/o Lt. Shri Udan Singh Yadav Aged About 44 Years Occupation - Service Working As Assistant Sub - Inspector, P.S. Charama, District North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry of Home, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Superintendent of Police District North Bastar, Kanker (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Arya Shrivastava, and Mr. Rakesh Kumar Manikpuri, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Abhishek Singh, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 22.07.2025 1. Heard Ms. Arya Shrivastava, and Mr. Rakesh Kumar Manikpuri learned counsels for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Abhishek Singh, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondents. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.07.22 18:59:27 +0530 2 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following relief(s):- “10.1 This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to call for the records from the respondent concerned pertaining to the case of the petitioner for your kind perusal. 10.2 This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to set aside the impugned transfer order dated 03.10.2023 passed by respondent No.2, and in effect, the petitioner be allowed to work at his present place of posting. 10.3 Cost of the Proceedings. 10.4 Any other writs and directions that the Hon'ble court deems fit and just depending upon the facts & circumstances of the case.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, instant writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents having no objection. 5. Accordingly, instant writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh