Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39232 (AP)

Sri.Tadiboina Ramayya, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/35634/2017 · 2025-09-09

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010849052017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 35634/2017 Between: 1. SRI.TADIBOINA RAMAYYA,, S/O SRI. T. NAGESWARA RAO AGED 35 YEARS, OCC:WARD COUNCILOR R/O 13- 5-9, CHINTALPUDI STREET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, GUNTUR. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR GUNTUR DISTRICT GUNTUR, - 3. TENALI MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SRI PENDELA VENKAT RAO, CHAIRPERSON, MUNICIPALITY, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for records relating to the Resolution Np. 662 dated 29.09.2017 passed by Municipal Council, Tenali, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh and set aside the same as illegal, arbitrary, against the provisions of law and principles of natural justice and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 44283 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Resolution No. 662 dated 29.09.2017 passed by Municipal Council, Tenali, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 3. N RAVI PRASAD 4. VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA 3 The Court made the following Order: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments, the cause of action raised in the present Writ Petition does not survive any further consideration. 2. Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 10.09.2025 NKA 4 107 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.35634 of 2017 Date: 10.09.2025 NKA