H Q: % iP ^r> >, APHC010849902018 o IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI N? (Special Original Jurisdiction) C> ' SSt"' FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 41078 OF 2018 Between: 1. Kunchala Narasimham, Son of K. Kotaiah, aged about 70 years, R/o Vadderapalem, Annangi Village, Maddipadu Mandal, Prakasam District. 2. Vallepu Ankamma, S/o Vallepu Venkateswarulu, aged about 43 R/o Vadderapalem, Annangi Village, Maddipadu Mandal, Prakasam District. years. 3. Tanneru Koteswaramma, W/o T. Pedda Tirupalu, aged about 67 years, R/o Vadderapalem, Annangi Village, Maddipadu Mandal, Prakasam District. 4. Tanneru Koteswara Rao, S/o T. Anjamma, aged about 51 years, R/o Vadderapalem, Annangi Village, Maddipadu Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by the Secretary Government, Revenue (Regn. and Stamps) Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. The Commissioner and Inspector General of Stamps and Registration, Government of Andhra Pradesh, R.K. Spring Valley, Idupugally, Vijayawada, Krishna District. to 4. The Deputy Inspector General of Regn and Stamps, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Ongole, Prakasam District. 5. The District Registrar, Prakasam District, Markapur. 6. The Sub Registrar, Addanki, Prakasam District. 7. Smt Ravipati Seshamma, Wife of Pedda Yallamanda, Aged about 58 years, Managing Partner, Suresh Babu Companies, Bujrepalli Village, Maddipadu Mandel, Prakasam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court pleased to issue a Writ, in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus praying that in the may be or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order declaring the inaction of the authorities in taking action in pursuance of the Report of the District Registrar vide Lr.No.G/238/2012, dated 20/06/2012 as illegal and void and consequently direct the authorities to take action under Sections 81 to 83 of the Registration Act read with Rule 26(K) of the Registration Rules and also to launch prosecution against the erring persons who indulged in impersonation and forgery in executing the document No. 472/2012, dated 11/10/2010. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI M SIVA PRASAD r __ COUNSEL APPEARED ON BEHALF OF P KAMLAKAR Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 6: GP FOR ASSIGNMENT Counsel for the Respondents: SRI N RAVI PRASAD The Court made the following order: REDDY, LEARNED (AP) r e APHC010849902018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] FRIDAY. THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 41078/2018 Between: 1.KUNCHALA NARASIMHAM, SON OF K. KOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/0 VADDERAPALEM, ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANUAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2.VALLEPU ANKAMMA, S/0 VALLEPU VENKATESWARULU. AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/0 VADDERAPALEM, ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANUAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3.TANNERU KOTESWARAMMA, W/0 T. PEDDA TIRUPALU, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/0 VADDERAPALEM. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANUAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4.TANNERU KOTESWARA RAO, S/0 T. ANJAMMA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/0 VADDERAPALEM, ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANUAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE (REGN. AND STAMPS) DEPARTMENT. A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 3.THE COMMISSIONER AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, R.K. SPRING VALLEY, IDUPUGALLY, VIJAYAWADA. KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4.THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGN AND STAMPS, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5.THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, MARKAPUR. 6.THE SUB REGISTRAR, ADDANKI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7.SMT RAVIPATI SESHAMMA, WIFE OF PEDDA YALLAMANDA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, MANAGING PARTNER, SURESH BABU COMPANIES, BUJREPALLI VILLAGE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. MADDIPADU MANDEL, ...RESPONDENT{S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order declaring the inaction of the authorities in taking action in pursuance of the Report of the District Registrar vide Lr.No.G/238/2012, dated 20/06/2012 as illegal and void and consequently direct the authorities to take action under Sections 81 to 83 of the Registration Act read with Rule 26(K) of the Registration Rules and also to launch prosecution against the erring persons who indulged in impersonation and forgery in executing the document No. 472/2012, dated 11/10/2010. and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 to 6 and their subordinates not to entertain any document for registration in respect of the land in Sy.No. 321/1, 2, 3 of an extent of Ac. 26.00 cents in Annangi Village, Maddipadu Mandal, Prakasam District, in pursuance of the fraudulently and void document No.472/2012, dated 11/10/2010. and pass lA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to amend/correct the survey No. wrongly mentioned as "Sy.No. 321/1, 2, 3" in the prayer portion of the affidavit as well as the direction petition, lA.No. 1/2018 in WP.no. 41078/2018, as "Sy.No. 312/1, 2, 3": and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.P KAMLAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1 .GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 2.N RAVI PRASAD The Court made the following: Mr. M Siva Prasad Reddy, learned counsel, appeared on behalf of Mr. P Kamalakar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and states that in view of the letter addressed by the writ petitioners, the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed. Recording the same and in view of the withdrawal memo dated 14.07.2025 and the letter dated 12.07.2025 of the writ petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. 2. Sd/-K. TATA RAO DEPUTY ■ GISTRAR P' //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, One CC to SRI P KAMLAKAR Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR Pradesh [OUT] One CC to SRI N RAVI PRASAD Advocate (OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies 1. assignment (AP) High Court of Andhra 3. gsg *5 HIGH COURT DATED: 25/07/2025 S 13 AUG 2025 i; . Current Section ORDER WP NO. 41078 OF 2018 69, DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS