- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29153 RPFC No. 238 of 2023 C/W RPFC No. 119 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 238 OF 2023 C/W REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 119 OF 2025 IN RPFC No. 238/2023 BETWEEN: MR. ABHISHEK RAI S/O LATE GUNPAL RAI AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/A APARTMENT NO.109 “KRISHNA HERITAGE” NEAR B.C.ROAD BUS STAND B.C.ROAD, BANTWAL-574 219 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AJAY PRABHU M., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. POORNIMA RAI W/O ABHISHEK RAI D/O RAGHURAM RAI AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/A “TRIVENI NILAYA” SCHOOL ROAD, VITTLA BANTWAL TALUK-574 243 PRESENTLY R/A AISHANI SHREYASI KADRI TEMPLE ROAD MANGALURU-575 002 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SRUTI C CHAGANTI, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29153 RPFC No. 238 of 2023 C/W RPFC No. 119 of 2025 THIS RPFC FILED UNDER SC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 05.09.2023 PASSED IN CRL.MISC NO.63/2022 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, D.K. MANGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC. 125 OF CR.P.C. FOR SEEKING MONTHLY MAINTENANCE IN RPFC NO. 119/2025 BETWEEN: SMT.POORNIMA RAI W/O ABHISHEK RAI, D/O RAGHURAM RAI, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT TRIVENI NILAYA, SCHOOL ROAD, VITTLA, BANTAWAL TALUK-574 243 PRESENTLY RESIDING AT AISHANI SHREYASI, KHADRI TEMPLE ROAD, MANGALURU-574243. ...PETITIONER (BY SMT. SRUTI CHAGANTI, ADVOCATE) AND: SHRI ABSHISHEK RAI S/O LATE GUNPAL RAI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT APARTMENT NO. 109, KRISHNA HERITAGE, NEAR BC ROAD BUSSTAND, B C ROAD, BANTWAL-574 219 ...RESPONDENT THIS RPFC FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 05.09.2023 PASSED IN Crl. Misc NO.63/2022 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT.D.K, MANGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.125 OF Cr.P.C., FOR MAINTENANCE. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29153 RPFC No. 238 of 2023 C/W RPFC No. 119 of 2025 THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for both the petitioner’s submits that the dispute is settled between the parties and both the petitioner’s do not want to pursue the matter. Accordingly, the both the RPFC’s is dismissed. All pending I.As., in the petitions shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35