[2025:RJ-JP:37343] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13884/2025 Subhash Gurjar S/o Ramniwas Gurjar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Dhani Dhalera, Vpo Bhuri Bharaj, Tehsil Paota, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 2241187) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer, (Elementary Education) Headquarter, Bikaner. 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Amir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. H. S. Shekhawat with Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore, AAAG on behalf of Mr. S. S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 15/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was declared successful in the selection process for the post of Teacher Grade-III, Level 2 (Science-Math), having secured 187.2843 marks under the MBC NCL Male Category in the revised list. 2. Vide order dated 26.09.2023, the respondents issued the district allotment list, whereby the petitioner was allotted District- Bikaner as the place of posting, as per his merit number i.e. 6976. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the respondents have discriminated against the petitioner in as much as candidates with lower merit number have been allotted their desired place of postings, whereas the petitioner, despite securing higher marks, has been allotted a posting approximately 600 kilometers away. He further submits that this action of the [2025:RJ-JP:37343] (2 of 2) [CW-13884/2025] respondents is contrary to the circular dated 18.05.2020 (Annexure-4). 4. Though various prayers have been made in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from his client, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if; he is permitted to file a representation before respondent No.2 - Director, Primary Education, Bikaner (Rajasthan), encapsulating the grievances raised in the present writ petition; and if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to decide the same in a time-bound manner in the light of the circular dated 18.05.2020. 5. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar. 6. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent No.2- Director, Primary Education, Bikaner (Rajasthan). Respondent No.2 is directed to decide the said representation within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of filing of such representation by passing a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. 7. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioner’s grievance. The same shall not be construed as an order to decide the representation in any particular manner. 8. The stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/9