KRISHNA SHAMRAO GADGIL v. VIKRAM BALKRISHNA KULKARNI
SA/262/2019 · 2025-02-27
Gauri Godse
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39222 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39222 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
18.262.19 sa.docx Iresh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 262 OF 2019 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 30595 OF 2022 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 262 OF 2019 Krishna Shamrao Gadgil .....Appellant Vs. Vikram Balkrishna Kulkarni .....Respondent None for the appellant Mr. Yuvraj Narvankar for the respondent
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE :
27th FEBRUARY 2025
ORDER:
1. On 29th January 2025, following order was passed:
“1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the parties have already settled the dispute. He however needs time to take steps as respondent no. 3 has expired. He submits that the appeal be listed after three weeks to enable the parties to take appropriate steps for 1/2 IRESH MASHAL Digitally signed by IRESH MASHAL Date: 2025.02.28 15:41:57 +0530
18.262.19 sa.docx finalizing the consent terms.
2. List the matter on 20th February 2025 under the caption ‘for settlement’.”
2. On 20th February 2025, none appeared for the appellant. Hence, the second appeal was directed to be listed today for dismissal. Even today, none appears for the appellant.
3. The second appeal is dismissed in default.
4. In view of dismissal of second appeal, Interim Application No. 30595 of 2022 is disposed of as infructuous.
[GAURI GODSE, J.] 2/2