[2025:RJ-JP:43926] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16486/2025 Krishna Saini W/o Late Sh. Vishal Saini S/o Late Sh. Ramesh Chand Saini, Aged About 23 Years, R/o 8-B, Yadav Nagar, Tijara Fatak, Alwar ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Phed, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur- 302005 2. The Chief Engineer (Administration), Phed, Civil Lines, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. The Superintending Engineer Phed, Alwar. 4. The Assistant Engineer, Phed, City Sub- Division I, Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aditya Godara for Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 01/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “By an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents may be directed to call for the record of the petitioner. By an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents may be directed to consider the matter of the petitioner for appointment and pass an order of appointment on the post of Class-IV employee in favour of petitioner.” 2. Mr. Aditya Godara appearing on behalf of Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondents. [2025:RJ-JP:43926] (2 of 3) [CW-16486/2025] 3. Learned counsel for petitioner is directed to serve a copy of petition to learned counsel for respondent. 4. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. Mahi Yadav, AAG as counsel for respondent. 5. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon judgment in case of Smt. Pinki Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. 2012 (1) WLC (Raj.) 431 submits that the controversy raised herein is already settled and answered by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur and petitioner is entitled for compassionate appointment under Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servant Rules, 1996. He further submits that respondents are not taking any action despite pendency of application before them. 6. Learned counsel for respondents submits in case a representation is filed to the respondents in light of judgment referred hereinabove, the department will consider and decide the representation. 7. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if [2025:RJ-JP:43926] (3 of 3) [CW-16486/2025] petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 8. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /17