[2025:RJ-JP:4458] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 883/2025 Jahangeer @ Babu @ Doreman S/o Jakir Khan, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Bhankhari Bas Near Kaluram Ki Bawdi, Soorsagar, Police Station Soorsagar, District Jodhpur (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 884/2025 Aditya Singh S/o Kripal Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Teen Thok Jagheena, Police Station Udhyog Nagar, District Bharatpur (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 885/2025 Ravindra S/o Rambharosi, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Teen Thok Jagheena, Police Station Udhyog Nagar, District Bharatpur (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1214/2025 Prashant Kumar S/o Satyabhansingh, R/o Village Sogar, Police Station Kumher, District Deeg (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Sewar, District Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent [2025:RJ-JP:4458] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-883/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Navankur Dubey Ms. Chhavi Chaturvedi Ms. Pooja Dixit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 31/01/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed by the accused- petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS, in connection with FIR No.271/2024, registered at Police Station Kotwali Bharatpur, District Bharatpur for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 115 & 120B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused- petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel further submits that co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 10.01.2025. Counsel also submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody for about six months. Therefore, the accused-petitioners may be released on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 4. Considered the submissions made at Bar. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 10.01.2025 and the accused-petitioners are in custody for about [2025:RJ-JP:4458] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-883/2025] six months, this Court so as to maintain the parity but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 6. These bail applications are, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in connected case file. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J DIVYA SAINI /433-436