- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34390 WP No. 29207 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 29207 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: VAMADEVAPPA H., S/O LATE HARALIKATTE HANUMATHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/AT ANNEAPURA VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE TALLUK AND DISTRICT – 577 002 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. R. HIREMATHAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU – 560 001 2. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS KR CIRCLE, BENGALURU – 560 001 3. TECHNICAL ASSISTANT TO THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, DAVANAGERE – 577 003 4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS DAVANAGERE TALLUK DAVANAGERE – 577 003 Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34390 WP No. 29207 of 2024 5. THE SURVEYOR OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, DAVANAGERE TALLUK DAVANAGERE – 577 004 6. H. S. AJJANNA, S/O SHIVAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS AGRICULTURIST 7. B. SHIVARUDRAPPA S/O BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, 8. SMT. RATNAMMA W/O B. SHIVARUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST RESPONDENT NO.6 TO 8 ARE R/O ANNAPURA VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE TALLUK AND DISTRICT – 577 002 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 TO R5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 19.08.2024 IN NO. PRA. BHOO.JAM.NI.REVISIONL(DA):20/2023-24 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34390 WP No. 29207 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 02.09.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and to avail an alternative efficacious remedy available for the petitioner. 2. Memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn while reserving liberty to the petitioner as sought for. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE JT/- CT:UR