Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:52453 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10586 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Adhar And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 14.11.2024 (Annexure No.8 to the writ petition) passed by respondent no.2 in Revision No.398 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.C202414000000398) (Ram Adhar & others Vs. Pyari Devi & others), under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to not interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioner, during the pendency of Revision No.398 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.C202414000000398) (Ram Adhar & others Vs. Prayri Devi & others), under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 before the respondent no.2." 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the revision filed by the petitioner under Section 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, has been admitted but the stay application has been rejected. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this writ petition pending and a direction may be issued to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the revision filed by the petitioners in a time frame as fixed by this Court. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the above- mentioned revision, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. 6. Till disposal of the above-mentioned revision, parties are restrained from alienating the property in question subject to the condition that petitioners will not seek undue adjournments and in case, petitioners sought undue adjournment, the interim protection granted by this Court shall automatically be vacated. Order Date :- 10.4.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad