Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39204 (AP)

Sri Gajula Bhagawan, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/41174/2018 · 2025-07-29

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010850962018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 41174/2018 Between: 1. SRI GAJULA BHAGAWAN, S/O. VEERA SWAMY. AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC.- SOCIAL SERVICE, R/O. D. NO. 23-81-1, RAMANAIDUPET, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU VIJAYAWADA. 3. MACHILIPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THADIKONDA KOTESHWARA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.41174 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No. 2 in taking legal action against the officials, Council Members of respondent No. 3 for misappropriation of S.C. and S.T. Sub Plan funds by initiating Criminal Proceedings as per the complaint of the it petitioner, dated 18.09.2018 is arbitrary and illegal and consequently issue direction to the respondent No. 2 to register the criminal case against the officials, Council Members of respondent No. 3 and take legal action in the interest of justice and to pass…” 2. None appeared for the petitioner though the matter is posted under the caption “for dismissal”. Earlier also, there was no representation for the petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 30.07.2025. Pmk 3 32 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:41174 OF 2018 Date: 30.07.2025 Pmk