Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39203 (RAJ)

MOHAMMAD HASEEB SON OF MOHAMMAD SALEEM v. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION

CW/15803/2025 · 2025-10-16

Sanjeet Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42385] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15803/2025 Mohammad Haseeb Son Of Mohammad Saleem, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Spark Electric Service, Khan Manzil, Near Nagori Puliya, Lalsot Road, Dausa Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Central Board Of Secondary Education, New Delhi Through Its Secretary. 2. Shri Ashram The International School, Through Principal, Dausa District Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gaurav Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Raghav HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 16/10/2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner with the following prayers:- "1. By an appropriate writ, order or direction direct to the respondent to consider the application dated 27.07.2025, 17.09.2025 and thereafter make necessary correction in the mother’s name of the petitioner “Jubeda Begum" Instead of "Zubeda Begum" in secondary Mark Sheet (Annexure-1) as well as certificate issued by respondent No.1. 2. Issue any other writ order of direction which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. 3. Costs of the petition may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jigya Yadav (Minor) (Through Guardian / Father Hari Singh) v. C.B.S.E. (Central Board of Secondary Education) & Ors. (Civil Appeal No.3905/2011) as well as the order dated 20.09.2021 passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Tanuj Agarwal v. [2025:RJ-JP:42385] (2 of 2) [CW-15803/2025] The Central Board of Secondary Education & Anr. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14349/2019), the respondent - C.B.S.E. is required to consider the request of the petitioner for change of name of his mother. 3. Mr. M.S. Raghav, Advocate, puts in appearance on behalf of the respondent - C.B.S.E. and fairly submits that in view of the directions contained in the case of Jigya Yadav (supra), the respondent - C.B.S.E. has already formed the Standard Operating Procedure (S.O.P.) for consideration of such cases and further submits that if the petitioner submits the application through concerned School as per the S.O.P., the same will be considered by the respondent - C.B.S.E. 4. In this view of the matter, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make appropriate application through concerned School for change of name as per the S.O.P. of the respondent - C.B.S.E. 5. In case, such an application is filed, the respondent - C.B.S.E. is directed to decide the same within a period of three weeks thereafter, in terms of the directions contained in the case of Jigya Yadav (supra). 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J SAHIL SONI /25