APHC010831092018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 40048/2018 Between: 1. H.S. DHAN BASHA, S/O ISA SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 30-17-10, VARANASIVARI STREET SEETHARAMPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the 3rd respondent in not taking any action against on the complaint dt. 19-9-2018 given by the petitioner, inspite of his repeated visits, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to forthwith act upon the complaint dt. 19-9-2018 and take action in accordance with law, and to grant 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 herein to forthwith register a criminal case pursuant to the complaint dt. 19-9-2018, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KONDIPARTHI V RATNAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “….to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the 3rd respondent in not taking any action against on the complaint dt. 19-9-2018 given by the petitioner, inspite of his repeated visits, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to forthwith act upon the complaint dt. 19-9-2018 and take action in accordance with law, and to grant.…” 2. Heard Sri K.V.Ratnakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are not registering the complaint dated 19.09.2018, given by the petitioner. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, would submit that no case or FIR was registered on the basis of the complaint dated 19.08.2018. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that, if the petitioner submits a fresh petition, the same may be considered by the police in accordance with law. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the writ petition may be disposed of. 6. Recording the submission of learned Assistant Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to recourse his remedies according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 21.07.2025 MH 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 138 WRIT PETITION NO: 40048/2018 Dt.21.07.2025 MH