2025:JHHC:35694 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (civil) No. 596 of 2024 Tribhuwan Prasad Singh (Rtd. Sub Inspector), aged about 63 years, Son of Late Rameshwar Prasad Singh, resident of Singhara, P.O. and P.S.- Mahua, District- Viashali (Bihar), presently, residing at Bajinathpur, near Dodhkathi, Dumka Road, P.O. and P.S.- Deoghar, District- Deoghar. … Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Vandana Dadel, Secretary, Home Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. and P.S.- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 3. Director General and Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand, having his office at Forest Officer’s Colony, Doranda, P.O. and P.S.- Doranda, District- Ranchi. 4. Deputy General of Police, Singhbhum (Kolhan) Area, Chaibasa, P.O. and P.S.- Chaibasa, District- West Singhbhum. 5. Superintendent of Police, West Singhbhum, P.O. and P.S.- Chaibasa, District- West Singhbhum. 6. Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kiriburu, P.O. and P.S.- Kiriburu, District- West Singhbhum. … Opposite Parties ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Ms. Khalida Haya Rashmi, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Ashutosh Anand, Adv. ----- 09/28.11.2025 The show-cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite parties, which has been sworn by Deputy Superintendent of Police, West Singhbhum, wherein the orders of consequential benefits has been annexed in favour of the petitioner as well as the amount credited in the account of the petitioner is also disclosed. It has been pointed out that total calculation was made to the tune of 47,59,134/- out of that after deduction of the tax to the tune of Rs. 10,33,600/-, Rs.37,25,534/- is credited in the account of the petitioner. 2. In view of the above, it appears that the writ Court order has been complied with. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that however the detail of the calculation is not provided to the petitioner. Mr. Ashutosh Anand, learned AAG-III on the instruction submits that the calculation will be provided to the petitioner by Monday. 2025:JHHC:35694 2 4. In view of the above, considering the amount which has been credited in the account of the petitioner prayer made in I.A. No. 15981 of 2025, I.A. No. 15833 of 2025, I.A. No. 15834 of 2025 and I.A. No. 15835 of 2025 filed for exemption from personal appearance of the Director General of Police, Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand, the Deputy General of Police, Chaibasa and the Superintendent of Police, West Singhbhum are hereby allowed and they are exempted to appear. These IAs are disposed of. 4. Consequently, this contempt proceeding is dropped and disposed of. 5. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he may take recourse under the law. 6. Consequently, further petition still pending is also disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-28.11.2025 Simran/