Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3920 (UTT)

RAJAT SINGH KASANA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C482/431/2024 · 2025-03-17

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS C482 No.431of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the applicant. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. with Ms. S.C. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for respondent no.2, through video conferencing. 4. A statement has been made by learned counsel for the applicant at bar that respondent no.2-Kewal Khurana has expired, on 23.02.2025, during pendency of the present C482 application. 5. In view of the subsequent development – demise of respondent no.2, nothing remains to decide in the present C482 application and the same is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 17.03.2025 SK