Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39197 (ALL)

ANKUR SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/10483/2025 · 2025-04-08

Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:51664 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10483 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ankur Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Maniji Bakhshi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent no.3 is not correcting the date of birth of the petitioner recorded in his High School Examination Certificate. In respect to his grievances, he has submitted several representations to the respondent no.3, but respondent no.3 has not paid any heed to the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no. 3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no.3-Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, Prayagraj through its Chairman within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives representation of the petitioner. (Saral Srivastava, J.) Order Date :- 9.4.2025 Sushil/- Digitally signed by :- SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad