[2025:RJ-JP:20033] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1473/2025 Smt Lali Devi Wife Of Shri Ramdhan Yadav, Resident Of Village Brajnathpura, Post Titriya Tehsil Chaksu District Jaipur State Rajasthan Police Station Shivdaspura- 9829262330. ----Applicant/Complainant/Revision Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its P.P. 2. Hanuman Sahay Son Of Shri Devinarayan, Resident Of Village Brajnathpura Post Titriya Tehsil Chaksu Police Station Shivdaspura District Jaipur (Accused No. 1). 3. Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank Branch Chandlai Tehsil Chaksu District Jaipur. (Accused No. 2). ----Accused-Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Bairwa For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, P.P. Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 13/05/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has assailed the revision order dated 21.01.2025 and original order dated 06.01.2023. Upon perusal of the impugned orders, it is noted that the FIR was lodged with a delay of approximately three years; that ingredients of the Section 420 and 406 IPC are not made out for the reason that there was no loss qua the property. The relevant portion of the impugned order dated 21.01.2025 is reiterated herein below:- “lEiw.kZ izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, ?kVuk ekg Qjojh 2019 esa ?kfVr gksus ds ckn yxHkx [2025:RJ-JP:20033] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-1473/2025] rhu o"kZ ds foyEc ls izdj.k ntZ djokus dk dksbZ Li"Vhdj.k ugha gksuk ifjokfnuh ds i{k dks nqcZy dj jgk gSA mYysf[kr vijk/kksa dh n`f"V ls Hkh izdj.k dk ifj'khyu djus ij izdV gksrk gS fd ifjokfnuh us izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 420 o 406 vkbZihlh esa ntZ djokbZ Fkh] ftlds vkijkf/kd rRoksa ds vk/kkj ij ?kVuk dk ewY;kadu djuk visf{kr gSA Ny ds vijk/k ds fy;s fdlh O;fDr }kjk vU; O;fDr dks csbZekuhiw.kZ vk'k; ls izoapuk dkfjr djrs gq, lEifRr ifjnku ds fy;s mRizsfjr djuk vko';d gS ijarq gLrxr izdj.k esa foi{khx.k }kjk fuxjkuhdrkZ dks csbZekuhiwoZd izoafpr djrs gq, dksbZ lEifRr ifjnku djokuk izdV ugha gks jgk gSA vkijkf/kd U;kl Hkax ds fy;s U;Lr lEifRr dk nqfoZfu;ksx fd;k tkuk visf{kr gS ijarq ifjokfnuh@fuxjkuhdrkZ us dgha Hkh ;g of.kZr ugha fd;k gS fd iz'uxr jkf'k dk foi{khx.k }kjk U;kl Hkax fd;k x;k gksA lEiw.kZ i=koyh ifjokfnuh@fuxjkuhdrkZ dks fdlh Hkh izdkj dh lnks"k gkfu dkfjr gksuk ,oa foi{kh la[;k 02 o 03 dks lnks"k ykHk dkfjr gksuk izFke n`"V;k Hkh izdV ugha dj ik jgh gS D;ksafd vkgfjr jkf'k cSad }kjk iqu% ifjoknh ds [kkrs esa tek djok nh xbZ Fkh tks fd fuxjkuhdrkZ dh Hkh Lohd`fr gSA izdj.k esa fdlh Hkh izdkj ds vijk/k ds xfBr gksus ds rRo fo|eku ugha gS ftu ij vUos"k.k fd;k tkuk visf{kr gksA ,slh fLFkfr esa fnukad 06-01-2023 dks fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fdlh Hkh n`f"V ls fof/k fo:) ;k =qfViw.kZ ugha dgk tk ldrk vkSj blfy;s mDr vkns'k esa gLr{ksi fd;s tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj U;k;ky; ds le{k ugha gSA vr% mijksDr foospu ds vk/kkj ij [2025:RJ-JP:20033] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-1473/2025] fuxjkuhdrkZ dh vksj ls izLrqr gLrxr fuxjkuh ;kfpdk Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA” Taking note of the aforestated, this Court is of the opinion that impugned order passed by the learned Trial Court is justified and requires no interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J GAURAV/22