APHC010844642018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 40797/2018 Between: 1. D.MUNI SANKARAN, S/O LATE MUNI RATHNAM AGED 46 YEARS, SUPERINTENDENT IN TTDS, WORKING IN VQC-1, TIRUMALA, R/O TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 2. THE TTD BOARD OF TRUSTEES, THE TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 3. THE JOINT EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE DEVASTHANAMS EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K ANANDA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. C SRINIVASA BABA SC FOR TTD The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.40797 OF 2018 COMMON ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus calling for the records relating to issuance of impugned Resolution No 408 (File Edn.3/DEO/2018), dt 09.10.2018 from the file of 1st Respondent and after perusing the same set aside the impugned Resolution dt.09.10.2018, in so far it relates to School Assistant (Social Studies) post by declaring it as arbitrary discriminatory illegal and contrary to law and consequently direct 1st Respondent to fill up all School Assistant Social Studies posts earmarked for recruitment by transfer in terms of Rule 9 (i) of TTDs Employees Service Rules, 1989 issued in GOMs.No.1060 Rev.(Endts.III) Dept., dt.24.10.1989 read with letter Rc.No. 230/PS- 1/2012, dt.30.07.2018 of Commissioner of School Education, AP and with all other consequential benefits, monetary or otherwise and pass…” 2. Heard learned counsel representing Sri K.Ananda Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.Srinivasa Baba, learned Standing Counsel for TTD. 3. Undisputedly, the petitioner made a representation dated 30.07.2018 and the same is pending before the TTD Authorities for consideration. 4. In that view of the matter, both parties agreed for disposal of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent authorities i.e., 2nd respondent, to consider the said representation in accordance with law and rules within a reasonable period not later than three (03) months from the date of this order. 3 5. The petitioner is at liberty to present fresh representation also, in addition to the earlier representation. If that be the case, the authorities shall consider the same in accordance with law and rules within a reasonable period not later than three (03) months from the date of this order. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 17.09.2025 Pmk 4 74 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:40797 of 2018 Date: 17.09.2025 Pmk