Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39193 (ALL)

NEERAJ SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/27657/2021 · 2025-10-06

Prakash Padia, Vivek Saran

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 27657 of 2021 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. The petitioner has preferred present writ petition inter-alia with the following prayer :- "i. writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to the respondents to refund the entire booking amount." 2. On the representation submitted by the petitioner, an order dated 05.08.2021 was passed by the respondent no.3, copy of which is appended as annexure-9 to the writ petition. The aforesaid order is not under challenge in the present writ petition. 3. It is argued by counsel for the petitioner that certain pleadings were also not incorporated in the writ petition and a prayer has been made to dismiss present writ petition as not pressed with liberty to file fresh writ petition. 4. Prayer made is allowed. 5. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty as prayed. October 7, 2025 Pramod Tripathi Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kumar Srivastava, Karshit Nigam, Sudhanshu Narain Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Neeraj Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad