Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39190 (RAJ)

MUKESH KUMAR GURJAR SON OF SHRI RAMPHOOL GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17827/2025 · 2025-11-20

Sanjeet Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47069] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17827/2025 1. Mukesh Kumar Gurjar Son Of Shri Ramphool Gurjar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat Lawan, Tehsil Lawan, District Dausa (Raj). 2. Jamna Devi Purviya W/o Shri Rambabu Purviya, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat Lawan, Tehsil Lawan, District Dausa (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary And Food Commissioner, Food And Civil Supplies And Consumer Affairs Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. District Collector (Supply), Dausa (Raj). 3. District Supply Officer, Dausa (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Gupta, Adv with Ms. Sudha Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 20/11/2025 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:- “1- ;g fd ;kphx.k ds izdj.k ls lacfU/kr leLr vfHkys[k foi{khx.k ls ryc Qjek;k tkos ,oe~ foi{khx.k }kjk tkjh fookfnr foKfIr fnukad 17&10&2025 tks fd mfpr ewY; nqdku uxjikfydk yok.k ¼iksl e’khu la[;k 2579+9½] ftyk nkSlk esa fLFkr gS] ds laca/k esa tkjh foKfIr dks ;kphx.k dh lhek rd fujLr Qjek;s tkus ckcr~ vkns’k ikfjr djus dh d`ik djsA 2- ;g fd foi{khx.k dks funsZf’kr fd;k tkos fd og ;kphx.k dks izkf/kdkjh i= ds vuqlkj forj.k ds iz;kstukFkZ vkoafVr {ks= ds ,fj;k esa fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ dVkSrh ugha dh tkos ,oa fjDr iksl e’khu ds isVs vkoafVr jk’kudkM~lZ dks lekuqikfrd :i ls ;kphx.k dh mfpr ewY; nqdku esa etZ djus ds vkns’k ikfjr djus dh d`ik djsaA 3- ;g fd vU; vuqrks"k tks ekuuh; U;k;ky; mfpr le>s ;kphx.k ds gd esa ikfjr djus dh d`ik djs ,oa [kpkZ eqdnek ;kphx.k dks foi{khx.k ls fnyk;k tkosA ” [2025:RJ-JP:47069] (2 of 2) [CW-17827/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the present petition may be disposed of at this stage in the light of the order dated 19.09.2025 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.14468/2025 and the petitioner may be given liberty to file representation before competent authority i.e. District Collector. 3. In light of the submissions made by learned counsel, this Court deems it proper to dispose of the present petition with a direction that the petitioners or aggrieved parties to mark their appearance before the concerned District Collector as per the recommendation of Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Wadhwa Committee(more specifically in para-19 of the said report) on 05.01.2026 around 11:00 am and after giving due audience, speaking order will be passed by the competent authority. 4. This Court makes it clear that till passing of orders, the allotment of the shop qua the disputed site will be kept in abeyance; passing of this order will not cause any prejudice to either of the sides. 5. The present petition is accordingly, disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. 6. Appropriate remedy will be available to the petitioner, if he is aggrieved by the order passed by the District Collector. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J AVINASH GULERIA /45