Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39182 (AP)

Kalluri Nasirunnisa v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/40837/2018 · 2025-08-31

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010845002018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 40837/2018 Between: 1. KALLURI NASIRUNNISA, D/O.CHINNA HUSSAINSA AGED 27 YEARS OCC.F.P.SHOP OF DEALER OF SHOP NO.19, YERRAGUNTLA VILLAGE, SIRVELLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AP ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP. 2. THE COMMISSIONER CIVIL SUPPLIES, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT, AP. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CS, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AP 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICERC S, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AP 5. THE TAHSILDAR C S, SIRVELLA MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT, AP ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent vide Rc.CS3. 105/2018 Dt.23-08-2018 in proposing to bifurcate the petitioners fair price shop no.19 along with other F.P. Shops of Yerraguntla Village, Sirvella Mandal, Kurnool District, AP and creating one additional Fair Price Shop No.43 at Yerraguntla Village, Sirvella Mandal, Kurnool District as being arbitrary, illegal and also in violation of principles of natural justice besides being violative of Art.14,19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to set aside the proceedings vide Rc.CS3.105/2018 Dt.23- 08- 2018 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the Notification issued by the 3rd respondent vide Rc.CS3/420/ 2018 dt.19-10- 2018 for the proposed newly created Shop No.43 situated at Yerraguntla Village, Sirvella Mandal, Kurnool District AP pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 14.11.2018 made in WP.No. 40837/2018 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y KAVYASHREE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Y KAVYASHREE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 40837/2018 ORDER:- When the matter was listed on 13.08.2025 and 19.08.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Even, today also there is no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 2. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 01.09.2025 JLV 302 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 40837/2018 Dt.01.09.2025 JLV