- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48816 WP No. 19404 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 19404 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR VARUN KUMAR S/O M MARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT HEBBAKKAVADI VILLAGE, KOTHATHI HOBLI, MANDYA-571 401 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARSHA V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA-571 401 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA-571 401 4. THE TASILDAR MANDYA DIVISION, MANDYA-571 401 Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48816 WP No. 19404 of 2025 5. MRS. BHAGYAMMA W/O LATE KRISHNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT HEBBAKKAVADI VILLAGE, KOTHATHI HOBLI, MANDYA -571 401 6. MR M K NAGENDRA S/O LATE KRISHNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT HEBBAKKAVADI VILLAGE, KOTHATHI HOBLI, MANDYA -571 401 7. MRS. KUMAR D/O LATE KRISHNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT HEBBAKKAVADI VILLAGE, KOTHATHI HOBLI, MANDYA-571 401 8. MRS H K DAKSHAYINI D/O LATE KRISHNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT HEBBAKAVADI VILLAGE, KOTHATHI HOBLI, MANDYA-571 401 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD. 05.03.2025 PASSED BY THE R-3 IN R.MISC.NO.603/2024 AT ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48816 WP No. 19404 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents. 2. Petitioner has called in question the correctness of the order at Annexure-D passed by the Assistant Commissioner. 3. Learned High Court Government Pleader submits that since the order is passed under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, petitioner could exhaust his right of revision under Section 136(3) of the Act as against the impugned order at Annexure-D. 4. In light of the same, petitioner is relegated to avail of the available statutory remedy as against Annexure-D. All contentions are kept open. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48816 WP No. 19404 of 2025 5. Accordingly, petition is disposed of. Office to return the original / certified copies of the documents, if any after retaining Xerox copies for reference. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP